Bruce Protocol METs Calculator

Calculate METs and VO2 max from your Bruce protocol treadmill time. Six ACSM equations, four max heart rate formulas, modified protocol support, fitness bands by age and sex, and the time to reach the next band.

https://hexacalculator.com/calculators/health/fitness/bruce-protocol-mets-calculator

Health

Fitness

Bruce Protocol METs Calculator

Calculate METs and VO2 max from your Bruce protocol treadmill time. Six ACSM equations, four max heart rate formulas, modified protocol support, fitness bands by age and sex, and the time to reach the next band.

Bruce Protocol METs Calculator

Your stress test

Every published Bruce regression comes in a separate male and female form, because men average a larger heart and more haemoglobin per litre of blood.

The modified protocol is the standard protocol with two easier stages bolted on the front, so its clock runs six minutes ahead.

min
sec

METs

ml/kg/min

Choose your sex, enter your age, and put in how long you lasted on the treadmill.

You will get your MET max and VO2 max, your maximum and 85 percent heart rates, the stage you reached, where that puts you on the ACSM fitness bands for your age, and how much longer you would need to last to reach the next band.

Loading calculator…

The Bruce protocol stress test ultimately provides only a single number: the time it was performed until the test is terminated. This calculator converts that single number into values for VO2 max, MET max, achieved stage and corresponding published fitness category, showing where those results fall within these categories. It also supports reverse calculation. If you enter a desired value or select the next section of a table, this tool will solve the same equation in reverse order to show how many more minutes you need to run on the treadmill.

What is the Bruce Protocol?

In 1963, cardiologist Robert Bruce of the University of Washington published a multi-stage test that bears his name. The previous standard method was the Master's two-step test, but it was too stressful for many patients and did little to show how the circulatory system responded to gradually increasing stress.

Its design is intentionally challenging in a controlled manner. You start walking at 1.7 miles per hour and an incline of 10 percent. Every three minutes the speed and incline increase simultaneously, and this increase continues until you have to stop the test. The speeds incrementally go from 1.7 to 6.0 miles per hour with seven classic stages. It is actually the incline that creates the stress: 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, and 22 percent. At stage five you are essentially running up a hill.

Stage

Minutes

Speed (mph)

Speed (km/h)

Gradient

Approx. METs

1

0 to 3

1.7

2.7

10 percent

4.6

2

3 to 6

2.5

4.0

12 percent

7.0

3

6 to 9

3.4

5.5

14 percent

10.1

4

9 to 12

4.2

6.8

16 percent

12.9

5

12 to 15

5.0

8.0

18 percent

15.0

6

15 to 18

5.5

8.9

20 percent

16.9

7

18 to 21

6.0

9.7

22 percent

19.2

Few people can complete all seven stages. To last 21 minutes on this treadmill is a world-class performance. For some individuals the protocol table may be extended to ten stages. Most healthy adults will stop between six and twelve minutes, which is also the time range for which estimates are valid.

From Minutes to VO2 Max

The entire test is based on a single insight: since the load at any given time is set by the protocol, elapsed time can be used as an indicator of achievable load intensity. And the load on the treadmill corresponds to oxygen consumption.

The most commonly used conversion method is the three-regression formula published by Foster and colleagues in 1984. In this case, T represents total time in minutes and decimals; nine minutes and fifteen seconds would be 9.25, not 9.15.

VO2max=14.76(1.379×T)+(0.451×T2)(0.012×T3)\text{VO}_2\text{max} = 14.76 - (1.379 \times T) + (0.451 \times T^2) - (0.012 \times T^3)

Some write the first constant as 14.8. This is Foster's published result of 14.76 rounded which shifts any value by 0.04 ml/kg/min or about 0.011 METs. This tool uses the values given in the publication.

The ACSM manual also contains four other regression equations that are adapted for specific populations and have a smaller range of application. These equations are linear and therefore easy to understand but may not be accurate enough in extreme cases.

Population

Equation

At T = 9 min

General

the Foster cubic above

30.1 ml/kg/min

Men

2.94T + 7.65

34.1 ml/kg/min

Young active men

3.62T + 3.91

36.5 ml/kg/min

Women

2.94T + 3.74

30.2 ml/kg/min

Young women

4.38T - 3.9

35.5 ml/kg/min

There is an important naming convention to be aware of here. Almost all online Bruce calculators use the formula 4.38T minus 3.9 and incorrectly label it as the female formula. In fact, in the original manual this is a regression formula for young women while the general female formula is: 2.94T plus 3.74. At nine minutes the difference between these two formulas' results is over five ml/kg/min which is an entire category for many women. To ensure comparability of values, this tool uses by default the same choice as most other tools. However you can select a different formula and check what each one represents.

Converting VO2max to METS.

The metabolic equivalent (MET) is a multiple of the basal metabolic rate. One MET is defined as the amount of oxygen used while sitting quietly, and is usually taken to be 3.5 milliliters of oxygen per kilogram of body weight per minute.

MET max=VO2max3.5\text{MET max} = \frac{\text{VO}_2\text{max}}{3.5}

The conversion is now complete. If the VO2 max is 35 ml/kg/min, this corresponds to 10 METs, which means that at the limit area ten times as much oxygen is consumed than when sitting on a sofa.

One MET is roughly equivalent to one kilocalorie per hour and kilogram of body weight. It's important to note here that it says "per hour." Surprisingly many sites incorrectly list this as "per minute." You can verify this for yourself. 3.5 ml/kg/min is equal to 210 ml per hour and kilogram, or 0.21 liters of oxygen, with the combustion of one liter of oxygen releasing about five kilocalories. If you multiply 0.21 by five, you get 1.05, which is very close to one kilocalorie per hour and kilogram. Calculated on a per-minute basis, an 80-kilogram person at rest would burn roughly 80 kilocalories per minute, about the same as a marathon runner.

What your MET score means:

METs are values that cardiologists actually care about; these thresholds correlate with health outcomes rather than athletic categories.

MET max

Reading

What it corresponds to

Under 5

Poor

Stopped before stage 2 on the standard protocol

5 to 7

Below average

Somewhere in stage 2

7 to 10

Average

Stage 3, around the nine-minute mark

10 to 13

Good

Stage 4, past twelve minutes

Over 13

Excellent

Stage 5 and beyond

Ten METs is an important value that comes up again and again. If this level is reached in a movement test, it usually has a good prognosis for the heart, regardless of the results of the electrocardiogram. With each additional MET, the risk of death falls by about 12 percent.

This is why the lower end of the scale is more important than the upper end. An improvement from 5 to 6 METs is worth a lot more in terms of results than an improvement from 15 to 16 METs. This also explains why aviation and military medicine place such emphasis on this aspect. The FAA requires pilots to spend at least nine minutes in stage 3, reaching about 10 METs, while reaching between 85% and 100% of their predicted maximum heart rate.

This is the rating table that this calculator uses to grade your performance.

Without knowing the age and gender of a person, VO2 max alone is not very meaningful. Aerobic capacity peaks around age 20 and then declines about 10 percent every decade after that. So while a value of 40 ml/kg/min might seem unimpressive for a 22-year-old, it's actually a good number for someone who is 62.

The following categories are the classifications used by the ACSM for general physical fitness. This tool will automatically select the appropriate row for you and show not only your current category but also the beginning of the next category as well as how many minutes you need to run on the treadmill in order to reach it.

Men, VO2 max (unit: ml/kg/min).

Age

Very poor

Poor

Below avg

Average

Above avg

Excellent

Superior

18 to 25

under 30

30 to 36.9

37 to 41.9

42 to 46.9

47 to 51.9

52 to 59.9

60 and up

26 to 35

under 30

30 to 34.9

35 to 39.9

40 to 42.9

43 to 48.9

49 to 55.9

56 and up

36 to 45

under 26

26 to 30.9

31 to 34.9

35 to 38.9

39 to 42.9

43 to 50.9

51 and up

46 to 55

under 25

25 to 28.9

29 to 31.9

32 to 35.9

36 to 38.9

39 to 44.9

45 and up

56 to 65

under 22

22 to 25.9

26 to 29.9

30 to 31.9

32 to 35.9

36 to 40.9

41 and up

66 and over

under 20

20 to 21.9

22 to 25.9

26 to 28.9

29 to 32.9

33 to 36.9

37 and up

Women, VO2 max (unit: ml/kg/min).

Age

Very poor

Poor

Below avg

Average

Above avg

Excellent

Superior

18 to 25

under 28

28 to 32.9

33 to 37.9

38 to 41.9

42 to 46.9

47 to 55.9

56 and up

26 to 35

under 26

26 to 30.9

31 to 34.9

35 to 38.9

39 to 44.9

45 to 51.9

52 and up

36 to 45

under 22

22 to 26.9

27 to 30.9

31 to 33.9

34 to 37.9

38 to 44.9

45 and up

46 to 55

under 20

20 to 24.9

25 to 27.9

28 to 30.9

31 to 33.9

34 to 39.9

40 and up

56 to 65

under 18

18 to 21.9

22 to 24.9

25 to 27.9

28 to 31.9

32 to 36.9

37 and up

66 and over

under 17

17 to 18.9

19 to 21.9

22 to 24.9

25 to 27.9

28 to 31.9

32 and up

Two important points can be seen from these tables that are easily overlooked. As age increases, the width of each category decreases so that a person may move up in categories even if their VO2max remains unchanged. The tables for men and women also gradually converge. Between ages 18 and 25 years, the difference between the start point of the "Superior" category is 4 ml/kg/min while at age 66 it is 5. On the other hand, the difference between the upper limits of the "Very poor" category is only 3.

Max heart rate and why there are four formulas.

The maximum heart rate is not an output of this test; it is an input parameter for the execution of the test. The reason for this is that a traditional goal is to achieve 85% of the predicted max heart rate, which is considered sufficient for a clinical stress test.

The problem is that age alone doesn't predict this very well. In the following formulas, the standard deviation around each predicted value is about 10 to 12 beats per minute, and that difference is larger than the differences between individual formulas.

This tool offers four formulas.

Oakland=192(0.007×age2)Fox=220age\text{Oakland} = 192 - (0.007 \times \text{age}^2) \qquad \text{Fox} = 220 - \text{age}
Tanaka=208(0.7×age)Gellish=206.9(0.67×age)\text{Tanaka} = 208 - (0.7 \times \text{age}) \qquad \text{Gellish} = 206.9 - (0.67 \times \text{age})

Formula

At age 20

At age 40

At age 60

Oakland nonlinear

189.2

180.8

166.8

Fox

200.0

180.0

160.0

Tanaka

194.0

180.0

166.0

Gellish

193.5

180.1

166.7

At 40 years of age all the formulas agree but as you go to the extremes they diverge. The popular "220 minus your age" formula produces outliers at the extremes, overestimating in younger people and underestimating in older people by up to six or seven beats per minute. This is exactly the problem that was addressed in later larger studies. If a test is stopped because of heart rate it would be wise to ask which formula the facility used before trying to interpret your results with respect to goals.

Heart rate zones based on fitness level: Karvonen method

Looking at only the percentage of maximum heart rate is a rough training goal because it ignores the starting point. Even if two people have the same maximum heart rate of 180, their actual exertion level when exercising with a heart rate of 140 beats per minute can be significantly different if their resting heart rates are 45 and 75 respectively.

The Karvonen method solves this problem by using heart rate variability, which is the difference between your resting heart rate and maximum heart rate.

THR=[(HRmaxHRrest)×%Intensity]+HRrest\text{THR} = \left[(\text{HR}_{\max} - \text{HR}_{\text{rest}}) \times \%\text{Intensity}\right] + \text{HR}_{\text{rest}}

For someone with a maximum heart rate of 180 and resting heart rate of 70 the heart rate variability is 110 beats per minute. Fifty percent intensity would be 125 beats per minute, and 85 percent would be 163 beats per minute. If you open the upper training zone option, the calculator will use your resting heart rate to calculate it. The measurement should be taken in bed before getting up, not after drinking coffee.

Modified Bruce Protocols and their use in this tool

The modified protocol is appropriate for individuals who cannot safely start at a 10 percent grade. This includes older adults, those with poor fitness levels or patients being tested shortly after a cardiac event.

Two additional stages are added before the standard test. Both have a speed of 1.7 mph and either 0 or 5 percent grade. After these six minutes are completed, the standard protocol resumes in Stage 1, and subsequent stages are identical.

It is precisely because of this structure that the conversion is reliable and not a mere estimate. As the improved sixth section corresponds to the zeroth section of the standard test, this tool subtracts exactly six minutes before applying the standard formula. However, there are some points to keep in mind. The regression equation itself was determined based on the standard protocol, and the added six minutes at low intensity have no effect on it. Therefore, the improved results tend to be somewhat more conservative. For this reason, some calculation tools reject the interpretation of the improved test outright. This tool displays the values and indicates where this uncertainty lies.

A full example:

A 30-year-old woman completed the standard test in 12 minutes and 30 seconds. That's 12.5 minutes, not 12.30.

So for the initial female formula, her VO2 max is equal to 4.38 times 12.5, minus 3.9, which equals 54.75 minus 3.9, giving us a result of 50.85 milliliters per kilogram per minute.

Dividing by 3.5 gives a max MET of 14.53. Twelve minutes and thirty seconds means she completed four full stages, and spent 30 seconds in stage five.

Their estimated maximum heart rate is 185.7 bpm, calculated as 192 minus 0.007 multiplied by 900, according to the Oakland formula. So their reference for 85% would be 157.8.

We compare this value to a table that classifies women aged 26-35 years. "Excellent" begins at 45 and "Superior" begins at 52. She is in the "Excellent" category and needs another 1.15 ml/kg/min. If we reverse the formula used, we find that she would need approximately 12.763 minutes to reach 52 ml/kg/min, which means she would have to run on a treadmill for about 16 seconds to reach the "Superior" range.

How accurate are these results?

The estimated values according to the Bruce protocol correlate strongly with directly measured VO2 max, correlation coefficients typically ranging from 0.85 to 0.92. However, at an individual level, the estimated values can differ by 10-15% from actual gas exchange.

There are three specific factors that can lead to deviations in the estimated values. The most important factor is holding on to the handrail. This reduces the load on the legs and significantly increases the time you can hold out for. If someone is not used to a treadmill with a steep incline, they may stop due to mechanical reasons rather than because of insufficient aerobic capacity. Trained athletes often reach their limits due to the incline itself before their cardiovascular system allows it, which is why protocols with slower inclines are better suited for them.

This estimate is most useful if you take repeated measurements of yourself. Two tests done in the same way will cancel out many systematic errors so a change from one MET value between the two occasions is more reliable than an absolute single value obtained on a single occasion.

When should a test be stopped?

Studies that end when the participant can no longer continue and in which symptoms play a role provide the best results. If a test is stopped only because a heart rate limit has been reached, information is lost.

However, there are situations where a test should be stopped regardless of the above principles. If chest pain or angina occurs, systolic blood pressure falls by more than 10 mmHg, systolic blood pressure reaches 250 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure exceeds 115, arrhythmias occur, wheezing or severe shortness of breath, cramps or claudication in the legs, dizziness, pale complexion or confusion, then the test should be stopped immediately. If a participant requests to stop at any time, this is sufficient reason alone. No explanation is required.

This tool is for educational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. The Bruce Protocol Test is a maximal intensity exercise test and should be performed under appropriate medical supervision, especially in individuals with known or suspected heart disease. The estimated VO2max and METs calculated from the treadmill time are population-based approximations and do not replace evaluation by a qualified physician.

Frequently asked questions

How to Calculate METs From a Bruce Protocol Test?

Convert the time on the treadmill to minutes including the fraction of a minute. For example, 9 minutes and 15 seconds is 9.25. Then input this value into a regression formula that is appropriate for your population. One common form is the cubic equation by Foster shown in full above. A commonly used formula for women is: Multiply T by 4.38 and subtract 3.9. Both will give an VO2max value expressed in ml/kg/min. Divide this number by 3.5 to get a METmax value. One MET is the oxygen uptake of 3.5 ml per minute per kilogram body weight.

What is a good MET value in an exercise test?

A value over 10 METs is generally considered good and associated with a healthy heart. A value above 13 METs is excellent and usually only reached by trained individuals. A value below 5 METs indicates poor fitness and higher risk. However, since the "good" values vary according to age and gender, this tool does not use one threshold for everyone but instead assesses VO2 max using ACSM tables adjusted for your age and gender group.

What is the MET number for stage four of the Bruce protocol?

It is about 10 to 13 METs but this depends on which table you use. The values that the ACSM gives for a speed of 4.2 mph and a grade of 16% after completing stage 4 are about 12.9 METs. A shorter table circulating online rounds this up to 10. Reaching stage 4 means being above average and going further so most adults would be in the good to excellent range.

Why do the Bruce protocol calculators give different results?

This is because each tool secretly uses a different formula. Some use Foster's general cubic equation while others change it depending on gender. Also the formula that most websites show as the female formula is actually the regression formula for young women in the ACSM handbook. There are also rounding differences in the constant of the cubic equation: 14.76 and 14.8. This tool shows instead of hides the formulas and allows you to choose them.

Can this calculator be used for the modified Bruce protocol?

Yes it can be used. If you select "Modified" the calculator will subtract six minutes before applying the formula as the modified protocol adds an additional Phase 0 and an additional Phase 0.5 compared to the standard protocol. This means that the sixth minute of the modified test is equivalent to the zeroth minute of the standard test. Note that published regression formulas are optimized for the standard protocol, so results from the modified protocol may be slightly more conservative.

Why is the value of 85 percent of maximum heart rate calculated? How is this value determined?

This is a threshold that should be reached in a clinical stress test and serves to make negative results meaningful. This tool uses one of four published formulas to estimate the maximum heart rate based on age. They are the non-linear Oakland formula, the 220-age formula, the Tanaka formula which is 208 minus 0.7 times age, or the Gellish formula which is 206.9 minus 0.67 times age. There is a variability of 10 to 12 beats for each person around any predicted value so that 85 percent should not be considered an absolute number but rather a guideline.

Is it safe to do the Bruce protocol test at home on a treadmill?

As this is a maximal intensity and steep grade stress test, it must be taken seriously. If you have known or suspected heart disease, then only perform it under medical supervision with ECG monitoring. Fit adults can wear a heart rate monitor and have another person in the room to assist them. Any chest pain, dizziness, shortness of breath, or leg cramps should result in immediate termination of the test. Most home treadmills may not even come close to the 22% grade of stage 7.

Related calculators

Disclaimer: This calculator is provided for general informational and educational purposes only. Our calculators are under active development, and results may be inaccurate, incomplete, or unsuitable for your situation. Always verify the figures independently and seek advice from a qualified professional before relying on them. We make no warranties and accept no liability for any loss or decision arising from use of this tool.

References

  1. Bruce RA, Kusumi F, Hosmer D (1973): Maximal oxygen intake and nomographic assessment of functional aerobic impairment in cardiovascular disease

    The American Heart Journal paper that established the protocol's use for estimating maximal oxygen intake.

  2. Foster C, Jackson AS, Pollock ML, et al. (1984): Generalized equations for predicting functional capacity from treadmill performance

    The source of the general cubic regression used here, including the 14.76 leading constant.

  3. American College of Sports Medicine: Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription

    The population-specific Bruce regressions and the VO2 max classification bands this calculator grades against.

  4. Tanaka H, Monahan KD, Seals DR (2001): Age-predicted maximal heart rate revisited

    The JACC meta-analysis behind the 208 minus 0.7 times age formula and the critique of 220 minus age.

  5. Myers J, Prakash M, Froelicher V, et al. (2002): Exercise capacity and mortality among men referred for exercise testing

    The New England Journal of Medicine study behind the mortality reduction per additional MET of exercise capacity.

  6. Vilcant V, Zeltser R: Treadmill Stress Testing (StatPearls)

    NCBI Bookshelf chapter covering indications, the modified protocol, and the criteria for terminating a test.

  7. Jette M, Sidney K, Blumchen G (1990): Metabolic equivalents (METS) in exercise testing, exercise prescription, and evaluation of functional capacity

    The Clinical Cardiology review that defines the MET and its relationship to oxygen uptake and energy expenditure.